British Council’s list of favo(u)rite words

1 Mother
2 Passion
3 Smile
4 Love
5 Eternity
6 Fantastic
7 Destiny
8 Freedom
9 Liberty
10 Tranquillity
11 Peace
12 Blossom
13 Sunshine
14 Sweetheart
15 Gorgeous
16 Cherish
17 Enthusiasm
18 Hope
19 Grace
20 Rainbow
21 Blue
22 Sunflower
23 Twinkle
24 Serendipity
25 Bliss
26 Lullaby
27 Sophisticated
28 Renaissance
29 Cute
30 Cosy
31 Butterfly
32 Galaxy
33 Hilarious
34 Moment
35 Extravaganza
36 Aqua
37 Sentiment
38 Cosmopolitan
39 Bubble
40 Pumpkin
41 Banana
42 Lollipop
43 If
44 Bumblebee
45 Giggle
46 Paradox
47 Delicacy
48 Peekaboo
49 Umbrella
50 Kangaroo
51 Flabbergasted
52 Hippopotamus
53 Gothic
54 Coconut
55 Smashing
56 Whoops
57 Tickle
58 Loquacious
59 Flip-flop
60 Smithereens
61 Oi
62 Gazebo
63 Hiccup
64 Hodgepodge
65 Shipshape
66 Explosion
67 Fuselage
68 Zing
69 Gum
70 Hen night

(Like any other survey-based list of favo(u)rites, it’s arbitrary, of course. And, yes, meaningless, aside from the meaning these words have to the however many thousands of people submitted their favorites. Together, some of the words are delicious surprises. I am a flabbergasted hippopotamus.)

(Guardian: “Mother’s the word,” by David Ward [November 25, 2004])

Free Knowledge

The Public Library of Science (PLoS) is a non-profit organization of scientists and physicians committed to making the world’s scientific and medical literature a freely available public resource.

Science (il)Literacy

How long does it take for the Earth to go around the Sun: one day, one month, or one year?

On a science literacy survey of 1574 adults, 54% answered this question correctly.

But don’t worry—this number jumped to a whopping 66% when it included only those who considered themselves part of an attentive public, i.e., people very interested in the subject who incidentally consider themselves very well informed and happen to be regular readers of (e.g.) a newspaper or national magazine.

(NSF survey PDF via Political Animal)

Rundown, In Brief

* * *

Sources & additional commentary-type crap:

  1. NYT: “A Death in the Box,” by Mary Beth Pfeiffer [October 31, 2004] – Above and beyond this startling factoid, the article is worth a read. While it approaches the subject through the story of one woman, it is by no means a straightforward case-study/human interest type article.
  2. Morphases – Go see it—you get to play with faces; it’s fun. (Though shouldn’t that be Morfaces?)
  3. Science Blog: “Humans and dolphins: If brain size is a measure, we’re not that different” – Human brains are 7 times larger than you’d expect, based on comparisons to similar-sized animals. For dolphins, it’s 5 times.
  4. with pictures, and English translations alongside the original German. Good fun. (link via MeFi)
  5. type in a word, find cliched substitutions.
  6. CalTech News: “The End of the Age of Oil,” by David Goodstein – adapted from talk
  7. Actually, don’t send me your brain. But feel free to check out the New York Brain Bank’s recommended procedure for packing and sending a fresh brain. And yes, the instructions do say “fresh” brain. That’s what the Ziploc bags are for, I guess—keeping the brain(s) fresh. Mmm. Fresh brain. (link via BoingBoing)
  8. NYT: “What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers’ Habits,” by Constance Hays [November 14, 2004] – As a matter-of-fact, it’s a database. And Wal-Mart’s checking it waaay more than twice.
  9. Double-Tongued Word Wrester defines “woobie” as

    a security blanket; a blankie; a favorite toy or object. Also wooby.

  10. The pictures that define the times.

Wizards

Of 13,000 people tested for the ability to detect deception, “we found 31, who we call wizards, who are usually able to tell whether the person is lying, whether the lie is about an opinion, how someone is feeling or about a theft,” [psychology professor Maureen O’Sullivan] said.

(AP: “Wizards can spot the signs of a liar” [local version] [October 14, 2004])

Caution: Sounder of Boar Ahead

BERLIN (Reuters) – A pack of wild boar wandered onto a German motorway, causing a five-car pileup and leaving one motorist injured and eight of the animals dead, police said on Saturday.

The cars on the Dresden-Berlin motorway hit the boar at high speed. One car flipped, injuring the 33-year-old woman driver.

(Reuters: “Pack of Wild Boar Causes Motorway Pileup” [November 1, 2004])

The Memory of Running

Memory of Running, by Ron McLartyThe Memory of Running
by Ron McLarty

…is decent, and readable, but too calculating for my tastes.

(Put another way, the film rights to the book were optioned to Warner Bros. for 7 figures, and it shows.)

This is a book you’re supposed to like. The plot is strange, but not too strange. Some characters are likeable, but of course they have their human flaws. And then there are the undesirables, cropping up from time to time. Bad stuff happens. If it happens to other people, too bad. If it happens to the Narrator (Smithy Ide), it’s overcome with help from Good People.

Aw, shucks.

I don’t mean to disparage this book because, as I said, it’s not wholly incompetent.

Notice I said “not wholly”.

Here are the qualms I have:

Characterization is very stop-and-go — some characters central to the plot are poorly conceived caricatures, while others who make incidental appearances are brilliantly portrayed. It’s nonsensical. For some people, the good spots might overcome the bad. Not for me.

The narrator’s a simple man. This in itself is not a problem. That he’s simple is a fact he tells you time and again, and you can tell—from his diction, from his mannerisms, from his reactions to uncomfortable situations — that he’s telling the truth. So far, so good. My problem with this is that it’s too calculating, or feels too calculating, at any rate. This isn’t the good-natured homey (yet strangely complex) simplicity of a Wendell Berry character, but the cold, carefully weighed simplicity of a door-to-door salesman. It feels fake, and the book suffers as a result.

(I doubt this is a result of author Ron McLarty being sinister or anything like that; it’s likely a result of him not knowing any other way to create a simple character. It’s not the best way to get the job done.)

The dialogue is atrocious. It’s ridiculously, absurdly simplistic at times, while other times the conversation participants delve into lengthy, hearty exposition that you could excuse if not for the fact that it does little to make any kind of valid, meaningful point (aside from the basic triad of [1] there’s suffering in the world, [2] some people are bad, and [3] some people are good — and, let’s face it, nobody needs to be told this). Or maybe it does, and there’s something I’m missing.

All told, The Memory of Running is a book to avoid. Not “avoid like the plague” avoid, mind you. But stay alert.

Upcoming Book Reviews:

  • The Family Tree by Carole Cadwalladr
  • Home Land by Sam Lipsyte
  • The Power Game by Joesph Nye, Jr.
  • Walking the Big Wild by Karsten Heuer
  • Ballad of the Whiskey Robber by Julian Rubinstein
  • Il Dottore by Ron Felber

Bring it all down

Why do you write? What is your main objective?

Derrick [Jensen]: My main objective is to bring down civilization. Actually that’s not quite true. My main objective is to live in a world with more wild salmon every year than the year before, more migratory songbirds, more natural forest communities, more fish in the ocean, less dioxin in every mother’s breast milk. And I’ll do what it takes to get there. And what it will take is for us to dismantle everything we see around us. It will take, at the very least, the destruction of civilization, which has been killing the planet for 6000 years.

I write because I am a recruiter for this revolution, in favor of life, and against civilization.

I don’t think most people care, and I don’t think most people will ever care. We can trot out whatever polls we want to try to prove most Americans actually do care about the Environment(TM), Justice(TM), Sustainability(TM)—that they care about anything beyond being left alone to numb themselves with alcohol, cheap consumables, and television. We can cite (or make up) some poll saying that all other things being equal, 64 percent of Americans don’t want penguins to be driven extinct (unless saving them will even slightly increase the price of gasoline); or we can cite (or make up) some other poll saying that 22 percent of American males would prefer to live on a habitable planet than to have sex with a supermodel (this number climbs to 45 percent if the men are not allowed to brag about it to their friends). But the truth is that it’s just not that important to most people, it in this case being the survival of tigers, salmon, traditional indigenous peoples, oceans, rivers, the earth; it also being justice, fairness, love, honesty, peace. If it were, “most people” would do something about it.

Sure, most people would rather that they themselves be treated with at least the pretense of justice, fairness, and so on, but so long as those in power aren’t aiming their Peacekeepers(TM) at me, why should I care if brown people living on a sea of oil a half a world away get blown to bits? Likewise, so long as the price of my prescription anti-depressants stays reasonably low and the number of TV channels on my satellite dish stays high, why should I care that some stupid fish can’t survive in a dammed river? It’s survival of the fittest, damn it all, and I’m one of the fit, so I get to survive.

(The first part is from an interview; the second part [after the ellipsis] is quoted within the interview, and is part of a work-in-progress of Jensen’s.)

(Alternative Press Review: “Bring it all down: An interview with Derrick Jensen”; originally published in Green Anarchy [Summer 2004])

Alaska, I never knew ye

Alaska’s Virtual Library & Digital Archive is a wonderful resource that, if nothing else, is certainly bound to turn up all sorts of interesting images. Helpful, possibly, if you should happen to need historical images of Alaska.

greeter dog

The archive has lots and lots and lots of images, with a database that’s searchable by region, area, time period, date, subject, creator (not to mention publisher, contributor, audience, title, format, language, relation [is referenced by, is a part of, is a version of… etc.]). We’re talking mondo advanced search here.

(Oh: and you can zoom & pan online.)

More than 8000 items total.

A Few Things

  • Money Map. Yes, so we’re all sick and tired of red-/blue-/purple- state maps, but the Money Map (courtesy of the Fundrace Project) is interesting for the fact that it bases its colors on actual money given to the parties. Also, it’s massively customizable: you can see divisions by state, zip code, or county; and you can look at donations to Democrats vs. Republicans, to GW & the RNC, to Kerry & the DNC, to Edwards, Dean, Clark, Kucinich, Lieberman, and Sharpton. Neat.
  • Guns as White Tools. A recent study indicated that “[p]eople are more likely to misidentify tools as guns when they are first linked to African Americans.” What the study also showed, however, was that the same people understood their misidentification on some level; in one study, nearly all participants expressed low confidence in their own assessment in the cases in which they were wrong. Similarly, people given a second shot at the gun/tool choice corrected their mistakes, bringing misidentifications down from 15 to 2 percent.

    Misidentifications went both ways, however, with participants mis-labeling guns as tools when they were associated with white faces. (This error also went down with the second assessment, dropping from 11 to 3 percent.)

    (EurekAlert!/Ohio State University: “Whites more likely to misidentify tools as guns when linked to black faces” [October 18, 2004])

  • The Periodic Table of Comic Books. Yes, it does exist. Each element has its own page listing the comics in which it appeared, with links to pages from those comics.
  • Ooh, aah, etc. Some excellent, high-quality QuickTime panoramas thanks to Écliptique. (via MeFi)