If you’re brilliant and you know it, clap your hands

Robert Cringely of PBS’s I, Cringely directs your attention to an interesting APA article on self-perception of skill (or, as some would say, on the burden of stupidity).

Cringely’s column is relatively interesting, though the APA article is actually more interesting. It’s fairly wide-ranging, looking at incompetence in humor, logical reasoning, grammar, and so on. One of the most interesting tidbits turned up by the study is probably the confirmation that the unskilled tend to overestimate their own competence. It’s not that everyone overestimates her ability by a landslide; people of average ability (in any area) tend to overestimate their ability by a little, but not by much. People of unusual incompetence, however, “grossly overestimat[e] their ability relative to their peers.”

Another interesting effect that the article demonstrates is that the highly skilled (those in the top quartile) tend to underestimate their own ability, not so much because they are unaware of their skill as because they simply assume others will do equally well in the task at hand.

Anyway, the point is, it’s an interesting article, worth a read if you’re curious. (The article is also pretty straightforward and easy to understand, as journal articles go, so there’s no need to be intimidated by the fact that it appeared in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Which, maybe you would be and maybe you wouldn’t.)

(APA: “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments” by Justin Kruger and David Dunning [1999]; article discovered via I, Cringely: “Clueless in Seattle” by Robert Cringely [June 17, 2004])

Oddities: Age Record, Nonnews, and Humor

  • Early to bed, early to rise. Hamida Musulmani says, “I only eat what I grow. I am fine, it is only my eyes that cannot see properly.” The Lebanese woman has documents that put her age at 126. (The New Zealand version of the Reuters article adds: “Many titleholders [of the world’s oldest living person] have been exclusively or largely vegetarian, but others have bucked the trend by being cigar-smoking, chocolate-loving, alcohol-imbibing carnivores.” Sadly, it lists none of them. A web page titled simply “The Oldest Human Beings” lists a whole bundle of record-holders of the title, but does not mention their eating/drinking habits.) (Reuters: “Lebanese Woman Could Be World’s Oldest — at 126” [June 15, 2004])
  • Watch Lobster. It’s always fun when an article takes a complete non-story—something that would possibly pass as an interesting anecdote in casual conversation—and tries to pretend it’s actually something worth reporting. I’m not saying I don’t enjoy these articles, because, after all, they provide good excuses for using sentences like “[w]hatever the motive, the lobster has nothing to worry about.” But you have to wonder where in the chain of editorial responsibility someone actually had the thought, “wow! they found a lobster next to a watch—and in the ocean, no less!” and then proceeded to think “I bet that’ll make a good news article.” (AP: “Lobster found guarding watch off England” [June 17, 2004])
  • I’ll bet that’s funny. Ha ha. A preliminary study at Dartmouth indicates that humor “detection” and humor appreciation are handled by two separate areas of the brain. An interesting study, but obviously not the last laugh. More questions raised than answered and so forth. (Scientific American: “Sitcoms on the Brain” by Marina Krakovsky [June 14, 2004] via BoingBoing)

The Most Popular Books

(…in public libraries that participated in Library Journal’s survey.)

check it out

Read the CSM article, skim the list (PDF file, excerpted above).

(via CSM: “Libraries reveal their favorites” by Ron Charles [June 22, 2004])

Good Advice

the last thing you'll see

“If you do fall to the ground, lie still, and cover your head with your hands until the danger has passed.”

Visit Your Guide to San Fermin for other helpful tips. The section on Food, Drink and Sleeping is pretty comprehensive, though you might want to check out the section titled “Watch Out!” Maybe. Of course, perhaps you’d rather not know about the danger of a nighttime stroll along the city walls (you might fall off, the guide warns, particularly if you’ve “had a drink too many”).

Also check out more handy info on the running of the bulls, including daily photos, injury reports, statistics on past runnings, etc.

Cows, Pigs, Wars, and Witches

cows, pigs, wars, and witchesCows, Pigs, Wars, and Witches is a fun romp by everybody’s favorite anthropologist, Marvin Harris. It looks at behavior that seems illogical to an outside observer—the sacred cow, the hated pig (and even the loved pig), the potlach, and so on—in an attempt to explain away the riddles.

There are numerous chapters (as there are in many books), and each deals with a different riddle—though the explications Harris provides are somewhat cumulative, building on each of the previous answers. Some of the answers, which right away Harris reminds the reader aren’t even answers so much as reasonable theories, are more dubious than others; on the whole, however, the book is amusing, interesting, and edifying. And, for all the complexity of the subject, Harris keeps his explanations low-key, straightforward, and simple.

Which, you have to admit, is a good thing.

What’s most interesting, maybe, is Harris’ rational for writing this book. His rational is basically that, as soon as you’ve answered one riddle, another pops up. In using a brute-force method of attacking riddles one after another, Marvin not only provides feasible explanations, he also begins to show the reader how to arrive at these explanations. Granted, CPW&W isn’t exactly a How-To-Become-A-Professional-Anthropologist (or anything else, for that matter) manual in all the gory detail. But by the time the reader’s gotten to the end of the book, she (he/it) has at least a sense of how to begin looking for answers.

CPW&W covers lots of topics, like I said earlier. It covers the sacred cow (Cows), various attitudes towards pigs (Pigs), and primitive wars (Wars). It covers phantom cargo and religious messiahs. It covers witches (& Witches). In short, there’s something for everybody. Even if you don’t buy all the explanations—and you’re probably not going to, would be my guess—it’s an interesting journey that’s bound to impart at least some kind of knowledge on your wearied brain.

So there you have it.

Freak vending machine accident

Pretty much by definition, freak accidents don’t happen every day. Particularly freak accidents involving exploding vending machines that expel poisonous gas.

Yes, freak accidents involving exploding vending machines that happen, through the wonders of happy coincidence, to produce something like phosgene gas (used in WWI as a chemical warfare agent)—these aren’t things that happen every day.

But, you know. They happen. Not very often, but they happen.

Exploding vending machines—these are things we have to live with.

“The vending machine I was working on…”
“Yes?”
“Well, there’s a problem.”
“What’s that?”
“It exploded.”
“Exploded?”
“Not the whole thing, of course. Not a violent explosion or anything, just a minor internal explosion. A small fire.”
“Well, are you okay?”
“I think so. I’m a little dizzy, though.”
“Dizzy? Do you need to sit down?”
“Maybe.”
“Is the machine still on fire?”
“Oh… right. I… I don’t think so. …I—”
“Yes?”
“My throat burns, just a little bit.”
“Why don’t you sit down.”
“I don’t feel so well.”
“Good God, man… I think you’ve been exposed to phosgene gas.”
“But… how?”
“You see, when the fire contacted the freon from the cooling system, it must have somehow, through the wonders of chemistry, transformed it into phosgene.”
“My vision’s a little blurry.”
“We’ve got to evacuate.”
“Before it’s too late.”

(Reuters: “Here’s Something That Doesn’t Happen Every Day…” [June 25, 2004])

Word-of-the-Month: REGREETS

Regreets.

It’s listed in MW101 as obsolete, which is worse even than archaic (which means a word’s used only sporadically); that it’s declared as obsolete means there hasn’t been an observance of the word since 1755.

But regreets (n) has a certain ring to it, a wild and crazy cry of freedom. Let regreets ring.

It means, as you might guess, greetings. Regreets as in, greetings in return. As in,

“How’re you doing Marley?”
“Fine m’self, regreets to you.”

Or something like that. It has an off-canter air that seems to break through the banality of orginary greetings.

Fortunately, MW10 doesn’t relegate regreet (v) to obsoletism, rendering it archaic instead. Which creates the curious situation where you’re allowed to regreet someone without raising too many eyebrows, but not to offer regreets.

Regreets. Spread the word. Let’s bring this puppy back from the brink and into common use.

Notes:
[Word-of-the-Month] While there are plenty of words I’d like to write up in this fashion (e.g., veridical, aleatory, condign, myrmidon, etc.), regreets has my attention right now, and the likelihood of my following up with more of the same is highly unlikely; hence, W-o-t-M and not, say, Word-of-the-Day, or Word-of-the-Week.
1 Sadly, both regreet and regreets are ignored by American Heritage (AmH3) and by most any other language reference works I could get my hands on. And all an internet search turns up, more or less, is misspellings of regrets.

The Brain-Enhancement Revolution Will Be Simulcast

  • “The brain-enhancement revolution is already under way.” CSM has an interesting (if somewhat weak) article on the emerging world of neuroethics. It looks (in part) at what can and cannot be considered ethical in a world where someone can alter her own thought processes using, e.g., Modafinil (originally developed for narcolepsy but now used by those who simply want to be alert)? And of course there are the requisite pop-culture allusions (to make it seem current), but the article manages to raise some half-decent questions. Like where do you draw the line between therapy (i.e., performance-enhancement) and treatment of genuine disease? One question the article doesn’t ask—not explicitly, anyway—and that should be asked in this instance is, what do you do when diseased becomes a subsitution for normal, when not having your “performance” enhanced becomes equated with subnormality, everyone else hopped up on brain-boosters? (CSM: “Strange food for thought,” by Gregory M. Lamb [June 17, 2004])
  • Gone The Next. No one’s going to deny that having a 23-acre lake up and vanish is disconcerting. Things like lakes, we expect them to be fairly constant in whether or not they exist. (AP: “23-acre lake vanishes over the course of days” [June 11, 2004]; St. Louis Post-Dispatch: “”Fyooosh!” So long, Lake Chesterfield” by Joel Currier [June 11, 2004])
  • The Tortuous Logic of Torture. This editorial in the NYT addresses the recurring question of torture. What’s good in particular about this article is that it doesn’t waste a whole lot of breath on the morality of torture—not in anything like acknowledgement that torture is moral, but in acknowledgement that there are better grounds on which to challenge the legitimacy of torture. You should read it yourself, because it’s much more compelling than anything you’re going to read in this one-paragraph blurb, but the gist of it is, torture, often supported morally (if tentatively) in situations where there is imminent danger to large numbers of people, is not terribly successful at quickly obtaining vital information. (Unless you consider inaccurate information and outright lies somehow vital.) In fact, it’s not very good at obtaining information, period. What it is good at, budding democratic torture enthusiasts should note, is the assertion of authority in non-democratic countries. Undoubtedly it would have the same effect in democratic countries, but at the cost of undermining democracy itself. But how many times do I have to say it? Go read the thing. (NYT: “A Dangerous Calculus; What’s Wrong With Torturing a Qaeda Higher-Up?” by Michael Slackman [May 16, 2004])

The Update That Was In Order

My deepest and most heartfelt apologies to the 3 or 4 inveterate readers out there (I’m assuming they are out there; apologies to the rest of you if they’re not) who were deeply troubled by the multiple-day lapse in postings. Here’s the explanation:

giovanni puppy picture

His name’s Giovanni. Capisce?

More puppy pictures will doubtless follow.

I’ll see your Mussorgsky and raise you a Handel

Have you ever found yourself wondering what classical and/or operatic music was used in, say, Natural Born Killers?1 Or perhaps Babe, Pig in the City2, or Evil Dead II3?

Well, now you can find out, thanks to the all-too-aptly-named “Classical and Opera Music Used in Movies” page. You can browse by movie, composer, etc., and find out all sorts of nifty information. It’s not absolutely comprehensive, but with 975 movie titles, 172 composers, and 2239 total entries, it’s enough to get you started.

(via MeFi)

Notes:
1 Natural Born Killers: An extract from Berg’s opera, “Wozzeck,” Mussorgsky’s “A Night on Bald Mountain,” Orff’s (much-used and abused) “O Fortuna” from ‘Carmina Burana,’ and Puccini’s “Madame Butterfly.”
2 Babe, Pig in the City: Rossini’s “Largo al factotum” from ‘The Barber of Seville,’ Saint-Saëns’ “Symphony No. 3, 3rd Movement,” and Verdi’s “Anvil Chorus,” from Il Trovatore.
3 Evil-Dead II: Saint-Saëns’ Danse Macabre, Op. 40